Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
16.9%
in 2020
Poland
17.4%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
32nd
Poland rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 17.4% against 16.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.7% | 19.0% | 0.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 19.1% | 1.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 17.4% against 16.9% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population