Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kyrgyzstan
18.0%
in 2020
Poland
17.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
27th
Poland rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 18.0% against 17.4% in Poland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and Poland ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.4% | 19.7% | 0.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 18.5% | 0.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 18.0% against 17.4% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th and Poland ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population