Georgia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Georgia
20.5%
in 2021
Serbia
20.8%
in 2022
Georgia rank
20th
Serbia rank
19th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.8% against 20.5% in Georgia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 19th of 37 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.3% | 17.4% | 1.9% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 20.5% | 20.3% | 0.2% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.8% against 20.5% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Georgia ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 19th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population