Argentina vs Chile: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Argentina
24.5%
in 2022
Chile
24.5%
in 2022
Argentina rank
6th
Chile rank
7th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Argentina
- Chile
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24.5% against 24.5% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Argentina ranks 6th and Chile ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.5% | 24.2% | 2.6% | Chile |
| 2020s | 24.5% | 24.7% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Argentina or Chile?
- Argentina, at 24.5% against 24.5% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Argentina and Chile?
- 0.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Argentina ranks 6th and Chile ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population