Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
16.3%
in 2020
Viet Nam
14.5%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
31st
Viet Nam rank
34th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 16.3% against 14.5% in Viet Nam, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 34th of 35 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.2% | 16.4% | 1.8% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 14.5% | 1.8% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 16.3% against 14.5% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 1.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 34th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population