Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
15.5%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
16.5%
in 2020
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
32nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 16.5% against 15.5% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 35 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 13.0% | 13.7% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 16.8% | 0.8% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 16.5% against 15.5% in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population