El Salvador vs Romania: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
21.6%
in 2022
Romania
20.2%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
12th
Romania rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 21.6% against 20.2% in Romania, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
El Salvador ranks 12th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 19.3% | 1.2% | Romania |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 16.7% | 0.5% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 18.3% | 20.2% | 1.9% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Romania?
- El Salvador, at 21.6% against 20.2% in Romania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Romania?
- 1.4%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 12th and Romania ranks 15th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population