Costa Rica vs Dominican Republic: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Costa Rica
22.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic
21.6%
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
13th
Dominican Republic rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Costa Rica
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 22.5% against 21.6% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Dominican Republic ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 20.6% | 4.4% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 21.5% | 21.2% | 0.4% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 23.1% | 21.6% | 1.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Costa Rica or Dominican Republic?
- Costa Rica, at 22.5% against 21.6% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Costa Rica and Dominican Republic?
- 0.9%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Dominican Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Costa Rica and Dominican Republic rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th and Dominican Republic ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population