Peru vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Peru
1.4%
in 2022
South Africa
1.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
31st
South Africa rank
30th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 1.7% against 1.4% in Peru, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 30th of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.5% | 10.7% | 9.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 1.7% against 1.4% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Peru ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 30th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population