El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
El Salvador
9.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
11.3%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
17th
Mongolia rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 11.3% against 9.8% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 33 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 21.3% | 17.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 5.6% | 17.1% | 11.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 11.3% against 9.8% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- El Salvador ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population