Brazil vs Dominican Republic: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
2.6%
in 2022
Dominican Republic
5.5%
in 2019
Brazil rank
27th
Dominican Republic rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 5.5% against 2.6% in Brazil, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 2.1 times Brazil's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 27th and Dominican Republic ranks 25th of 33 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.6% | 10.7% | 9.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 5.1% | 3.5% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 5.5% against 2.6% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 2.9%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Dominican Republic rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 27th and Dominican Republic ranks 25th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population