Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
18.5%
in 2020
Peru
17.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
28th
Peru rank
30th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 18.5% against 17.9% in Peru, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 28th and Peru ranks 30th of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 13.0% | 6.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 13.6% | 4.9% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 18.5% | 12.5% | 6.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 18.5% against 17.9% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 28th and Peru ranks 30th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population