El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
19.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
20.4%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
31st
Mongolia rank
28th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 20.4% against 19.0% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 28th of 37 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.1% | 16.5% | 3.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 18.7% | 0.4% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 20.4% against 19.0% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 31st and Mongolia ranks 28th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population