Ecuador vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Ecuador
25.9%
in 2022
South Africa
27.9%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
9th
South Africa rank
7th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 27.9% against 25.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 7th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.9% | 27.9% | 4.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 23.4% | 25.4% | 2.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 27.9% against 25.9% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 2.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Ecuador ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population