Belarus vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
20.9%
in 2019
Mongolia
20.4%
in 2020
Belarus rank
27th
Mongolia rank
28th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 20.9% against 20.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 28th of 37 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.4% | 17.7% | 2.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 18.7% | 2.4% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 20.9% against 20.4% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 0.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 27th and Mongolia ranks 28th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population