Argentina vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Argentina
29.2%
in 2022
South Africa
27.9%
in 2021
Argentina rank
5th
South Africa rank
7th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Argentina
- South Africa
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 29.2% against 27.9% in South Africa, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.2% | 27.9% | 1.3% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 30.5% | 25.4% | 5.1% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Argentina or South Africa?
- Argentina, at 29.2% against 27.9% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Argentina and South Africa?
- 1.3%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Argentina and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Argentina ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population