Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Peru
13.9%
in 2022
Poland
13.8%
in 2019
Peru rank
29th
Poland rank
30th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Peru currently reports 13.9% against 13.8% in Poland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Peru ranks 29th and Poland ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6% | 18.8% | 5.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 16.6% | 3.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Peru or Poland?
- Peru, at 13.9% against 13.8% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Peru and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Peru ranks 29th and Poland ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population