Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
15.5%
in 2020
Poland
13.8%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
27th
Poland rank
30th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 15.5% against 13.8% in Poland, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Poland ranks 30th of 35 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.7% | 19.0% | 2.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 18.4% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 15.5% against 13.8% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Poland ranks 30th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population