Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
15.5%
in 2020
Peru
13.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
27th
Peru rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 15.5% against 13.9% in Peru, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Peru ranks 29th of 35 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.0% | 13.6% | 7.4% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 19.0% | 13.5% | 5.5% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 15.5% | 8.7% | 6.8% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 15.5% against 13.9% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Peru ranks 29th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population