El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
15.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
15.5%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
26th
Mongolia rank
27th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 15.5% against 15.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 35 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.8% | 21.7% | 8.9% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 19.0% | 4.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 15.5% against 15.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 26th and Mongolia ranks 27th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population