Belarus vs Ecuador: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
20.6%
in 2019
Ecuador
22.0%
in 2022
Belarus rank
14th
Ecuador rank
12th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 22.0% against 20.6% in Belarus, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 35 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.1% | 13.3% | 8.8% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 20.4% | 19.8% | 0.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 22.0% against 20.6% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 1.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population