Armenia vs Chile: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
25.2%
in 2022
Chile
26.3%
in 2022
Armenia rank
6th
Chile rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 26.3% against 25.2% in Armenia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Chile ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.6% | 25.9% | 0.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 23.0% | 25.0% | 2.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 26.3% against 25.2% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Chile?
- 1.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Chile ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population