Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Peru
17.5%
in 2022
Serbia
18.9%
in 2022
Peru rank
25th
Serbia rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 18.9% against 17.5% in Peru, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 24th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.4% | 13.5% | 0.9% | Peru |
| 2020s | 16.7% | 19.0% | 2.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 18.9% against 17.5% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Peru and Serbia?
- 1.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Peru ranks 25th and Serbia ranks 24th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population