Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Mongolia
19.0%
in 2020
Peru
17.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
23rd
Peru rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.0% against 17.5% in Peru, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.0% | 13.1% | 6.9% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 18.9% | 13.6% | 5.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 19.0% | 12.1% | 6.9% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 19.0% against 17.5% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Peru ranks 25th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population