El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
19.1%
in 2022
Mongolia
19.0%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
22nd
Mongolia rank
23rd
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 19.1% against 19.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.9% | 18.1% | 1.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 18.9% | 1.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 19.1% against 19.0% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 22nd and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population