Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
17.3%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
16.9%
in 2020
Belarus rank
27th
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 17.3% against 16.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 27th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 17.3% against 16.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.4%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 27th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population