Armenia vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
22.2%
in 2022
South Africa
22.6%
in 2021
Armenia rank
15th
South Africa rank
13th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 22.6% against 22.2% in Armenia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.9% | 25.1% | 2.2% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 22.0% | 19.0% | 2.9% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 22.6% against 22.2% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and South Africa?
- 0.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population