Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, total
Mauritius
33
in 2010
Namibia
32
in 2010
Mauritius rank
124th
Namibia rank
125th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, total over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 33 against 32 in Namibia, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.5 | 10 | 2.5 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 10.5 | 12.5 | 2 | Namibia |
| 1980s | 18.5 | 16 | 2.5 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 25.5 | 21.5 | 4 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 27 | 26.5 | 0.5 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 33 | 32 | 1 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, total, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 33 against 32 in Namibia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, total between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 1, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, total?
- Mauritius ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 125th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 65-69, total is the total population of 65-69 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.