Chile vs Malaysia: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female
Chile
290
in 2010
Malaysia
277
in 2010
Chile rank
43rd
Malaysia rank
45th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 290 against 277 in Malaysia, a difference of 13.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 43rd and Malaysia ranks 45th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 90 | 55 | 35 | Chile |
| 1970s | 112.5 | 80.5 | 32 | Chile |
| 1980s | 137.5 | 111.5 | 26 | Chile |
| 1990s | 177.5 | 151.5 | 26 | Chile |
| 2000s | 224 | 226 | 2 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 290 | 277 | 13 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female, Chile or Malaysia?
- Chile, at 290 against 277 in Malaysia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female between Chile and Malaysia?
- 13, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female?
- Chile ranks 43rd and Malaysia ranks 45th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 65-69, female is the female population of 65-69 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.