Australia vs Romania: Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female
Australia
452
in 2010
Romania
492
in 2010
Australia rank
31st
Romania rank
30th
Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female over time
- Australia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 492 against 452 in Australia, a difference of 40.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 31st and Romania ranks 30th of 144 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 188.5 | 328.5 | 140 | Romania |
| 1970s | 218.5 | 426.5 | 208 | Romania |
| 1980s | 289.5 | 405.5 | 116 | Romania |
| 1990s | 347.5 | 570.5 | 223 | Romania |
| 2000s | 356.5 | 613 | 256.5 | Romania |
| 2010s | 452 | 492 | 40 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female, Australia or Romania?
- Romania, at 492 against 452 in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female between Australia and Romania?
- 40, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Romania rank globally for barro-lee: population in thousands, age 65-69, female?
- Australia ranks 31st and Romania ranks 30th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Robert J. Barro and Jong-Wha Lee: http://www.barrolee.com/, published as Barro-Lee: Population in thousands, age 65-69, female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population in thousands, age 65-69, female is the female population of 65-69 year olds in thousands estimated by Barro-Lee.