Chile vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary
Chile
4.7%
in 2010
Latvia
4.6%
in 2010
Chile rank
31st
Latvia rank
33rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 4.7% against 4.6% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Chile ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 2.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% | Chile |
| 1990s | 2.8% | 2.4% | 0.4% | Chile |
| 2000s | 5.6% | 4.2% | 1.4% | Chile |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 4.6% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary, Chile or Latvia?
- Chile, at 4.7% against 4.6% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary between Chile and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Chile ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.