Australia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary
Australia
10.3%
in 2010
Philippines
8.5%
in 2010
Australia rank
8th
Philippines rank
11th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Australia currently reports 10.3% against 8.5% in Philippines, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 11th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.9% | 1.4% | 2.5% | Australia |
| 1970s | 4.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | Australia |
| 1980s | 3.8% | 4.9% | 1.1% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 4.2% | 10.7% | 6.5% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 5.7% | 13.2% | 7.6% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 8.5% | 1.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary, Australia or Philippines?
- Australia, at 10.3% against 8.5% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary between Australia and Philippines?
- 1.8%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 11th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.