Australia vs Finland: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary
Australia
10.3%
in 2010
Finland
9.0%
in 2010
Australia rank
8th
Finland rank
9th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Finland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 10.3% against 9.0% in Finland, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Finland ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.9% | 1.2% | 2.7% | Australia |
| 1970s | 4.5% | 2.1% | 2.4% | Australia |
| 1980s | 3.8% | 2.8% | 1.0% | Australia |
| 1990s | 4.2% | 4.1% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 2000s | 5.7% | 5.9% | 0.2% | Finland |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 9.0% | 1.3% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary, Australia or Finland?
- Australia, at 10.3% against 9.0% in Finland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary between Australia and Finland?
- 1.3%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Finland rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 8th and Finland ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.