Libya vs Nepal: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary
Libya
5.1%
in 2010
Nepal
5.5%
in 2010
Libya rank
93rd
Nepal rank
91st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 5.5% against 5.1% in Libya, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nepal ahead.
Libya ranks 93rd and Nepal ranks 91st of 144 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Nepal |
| 1970s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | Nepal |
| 1980s | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.3% | Nepal |
| 1990s | 1.0% | 4.5% | 3.5% | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.4% | 2.7% | 0.3% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 5.1% | 5.5% | 0.4% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary, Libya or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 5.5% against 5.1% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary between Libya and Nepal?
- 0.4%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nepal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Nepal rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 93rd and Nepal ranks 91st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.