Latvia vs Romania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary
Latvia
38.3%
in 2010
Romania
35.1%
in 2010
Latvia rank
6th
Romania rank
7th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 38.3% against 35.1% in Romania, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 7th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.9% | 3.5% | 3.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 8.7% | 12.5% | 3.7% | Romania |
| 1980s | 10.1% | 18.7% | 8.6% | Romania |
| 1990s | 17.5% | 29.2% | 11.8% | Romania |
| 2000s | 36.0% | 31.7% | 4.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 38.3% | 35.1% | 3.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary, Latvia or Romania?
- Latvia, at 38.3% against 35.1% in Romania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary between Latvia and Romania?
- 3.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 7th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 65-69 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.