Singapore vs Sri Lanka: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary
Singapore
2.5%
in 2010
Sri Lanka
2.6%
in 2010
Singapore rank
64th
Sri Lanka rank
62nd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Singapore
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2.6% against 2.5% in Singapore, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Singapore |
| 1970s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Singapore |
| 1980s | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1.1% | 2.1% | 0.9% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 2.5% | 2.6% | 0.1% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary, Singapore or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2.6% against 2.5% in Singapore as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary between Singapore and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Singapore and Sri Lanka rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Singapore ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.