Latvia vs South Africa: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary
Latvia
5.3%
in 2010
South Africa
5.5%
in 2010
Latvia rank
38th
South Africa rank
35th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 5.5% against 5.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was South Africa ahead.
Latvia ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 35th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.4% | 2.5% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 1970s | 1.4% | 2.6% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 1980s | 1.6% | 1.4% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 3.2% | 5.4% | 2.2% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 4.4% | 5.8% | 1.4% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 5.5% | 0.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary, Latvia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 5.5% against 5.3% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary between Latvia and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and South Africa rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 35th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.