Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary
Finland
11.1%
in 2010
Philippines
12.6%
in 2010
Finland rank
9th
Philippines rank
8th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 12.6% against 11.1% in Finland, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 2.6% | 2.3% | 0.3% | Finland |
| 1980s | 3.3% | 5.0% | 1.7% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 4.8% | 10.8% | 6.0% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 9.2% | 13.4% | 4.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 12.6% | 1.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary, Finland or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 12.6% against 11.1% in Finland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary between Finland and Philippines?
- 1.5%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.