Cuba vs Iceland: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary
Cuba
3.0%
in 2010
Iceland
3.4%
in 2010
Cuba rank
60th
Iceland rank
57th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Cuba
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 3.4% against 3.0% in Cuba, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 57th of 144 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.4% | Iceland |
| 1970s | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% | Iceland |
| 1980s | 0.5% | 1.4% | 1.0% | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0.4% | 2.2% | 1.7% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 1.4% | 2.7% | 1.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 3.4% | 0.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary, Cuba or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 3.4% against 3.0% in Cuba as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary between Cuba and Iceland?
- 0.4%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Cuba and Iceland rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Cuba ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 57th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.