Australia vs Finland: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary
Australia
9.8%
in 2010
Finland
11.1%
in 2010
Australia rank
12th
Finland rank
9th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 11.1% against 9.8% in Australia, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Finland ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.2% | 1.3% | 2.9% | Australia |
| 1970s | 5.3% | 2.6% | 2.7% | Australia |
| 1980s | 3.7% | 3.3% | 0.5% | Australia |
| 1990s | 4.8% | 4.8% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2000s | 6.7% | 9.2% | 2.5% | Finland |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 11.1% | 1.3% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary, Australia or Finland?
- Finland, at 11.1% against 9.8% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary between Australia and Finland?
- 1.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Finland rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 12th and Finland ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.