Latvia vs Tonga: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary
Latvia
36.4%
in 2010
Tonga
44.4%
in 2010
Latvia rank
6th
Tonga rank
3rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 44.4% against 36.4% in Latvia, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tonga ahead.
Latvia ranks 6th and Tonga ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.5% | 27.7% | 18.1% | Tonga |
| 1970s | 9.8% | 35.9% | 26.1% | Tonga |
| 1980s | 10.5% | 38.0% | 27.5% | Tonga |
| 1990s | 19.4% | 40.7% | 21.4% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 37.4% | 35.6% | 1.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 44.4% | 8.1% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary, Latvia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 44.4% against 36.4% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary between Latvia and Tonga?
- 8.0%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Tonga ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.