Latvia vs Romania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary
Latvia
36.4%
in 2010
Romania
32.5%
in 2010
Latvia rank
6th
Romania rank
9th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36.4% against 32.5% in Romania, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.5% | 4.1% | 5.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 9.8% | 16.4% | 6.6% | Romania |
| 1980s | 10.5% | 19.3% | 8.8% | Romania |
| 1990s | 19.4% | 31.0% | 11.6% | Romania |
| 2000s | 37.4% | 33.5% | 3.9% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 36.4% | 32.5% | 3.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary, Latvia or Romania?
- Latvia, at 36.4% against 32.5% in Romania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary between Latvia and Romania?
- 3.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Romania ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.