Ghana vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary
Ghana
32.7%
in 2010
Latvia
36.4%
in 2010
Ghana rank
8th
Latvia rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36.4% against 32.7% in Ghana, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 6th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 9.5% | 8.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 5.7% | 9.8% | 4.2% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 6.4% | 10.5% | 4.2% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 10.0% | 19.4% | 9.4% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 16.4% | 37.4% | 21.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 32.7% | 36.4% | 3.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary, Ghana or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 36.4% against 32.7% in Ghana as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary between Ghana and Latvia?
- 3.7%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Ghana ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.