Finland vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary
Finland
33.0%
in 2010
Latvia
36.4%
in 2010
Finland rank
7th
Latvia rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36.4% against 33.0% in Finland, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Finland ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 6th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.6% | 9.5% | 4.9% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 11.8% | 9.8% | 1.9% | Finland |
| 1980s | 6.1% | 10.5% | 4.4% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 10.4% | 19.4% | 9.0% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 19.2% | 37.4% | 18.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 33.0% | 36.4% | 3.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary, Finland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 36.4% against 33.0% in Finland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary between Finland and Latvia?
- 3.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Finland ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.