Australia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary
Australia
10.3%
in 2010
Philippines
12.6%
in 2010
Australia rank
11th
Philippines rank
9th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 12.6% against 10.3% in Australia, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | Australia |
| 1970s | 5.8% | 2.3% | 3.5% | Australia |
| 1980s | 4.4% | 5.0% | 0.6% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 6.0% | 10.8% | 4.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 8.3% | 14.3% | 6.0% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 10.3% | 12.6% | 2.3% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary, Australia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 12.6% against 10.3% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary between Australia and Philippines?
- 2.3%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 55-59 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.