Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary
Finland
18.5%
in 2010
Philippines
14.9%
in 2010
Finland rank
5th
Philippines rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Finland currently reports 18.5% against 14.9% in Philippines, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 6th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Finland |
| 1970s | 2.7% | 2.6% | 0.2% | Finland |
| 1980s | 4.9% | 5.0% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 7.8% | 10.8% | 3.0% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 13.2% | 14.3% | 1.1% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 14.9% | 3.6% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary, Finland or Philippines?
- Finland, at 18.5% against 14.9% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary between Finland and Philippines?
- 3.6%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 50-54 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.