Latvia vs Uruguay: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary
Latvia
5.9%
in 2010
Uruguay
5.6%
in 2010
Latvia rank
45th
Uruguay rank
47th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.9% against 5.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Uruguay ahead.
Latvia ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.5% | 3.6% | 2.1% | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 2.6% | 2.9% | 0.3% | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 3.9% | 3.7% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 4.8% | 4.7% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.0% | 5.3% | 0.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.9% | 5.6% | 0.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Latvia, at 5.9% against 5.6% in Uruguay as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0.3%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.