Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary
Finland
20.3%
in 2010
Philippines
14.9%
in 2010
Finland rank
4th
Philippines rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Finland currently reports 20.3% against 14.9% in Philippines, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 6th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 1970s | 2.9% | 2.6% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 1980s | 5.4% | 5.0% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 1990s | 8.3% | 11.0% | 2.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 15.0% | 14.8% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 20.3% | 14.9% | 5.4% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary, Finland or Philippines?
- Finland, at 20.3% against 14.9% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary between Finland and Philippines?
- 5.4%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 4th and Philippines ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.