Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary
Latvia
34.7%
in 2010
Zimbabwe
33.9%
in 2010
Latvia rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
13th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 34.7% against 33.9% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.5% | 0.9% | 9.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 14.3% | 1.2% | 13.1% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 19.5% | 3.2% | 16.3% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 27.5% | 7.5% | 20.0% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 36.7% | 24.0% | 12.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 34.7% | 33.9% | 0.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Latvia, at 34.7% against 33.9% in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 13th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.