Ghana vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary
Ghana
37.5%
in 2010
Latvia
34.7%
in 2010
Ghana rank
11th
Latvia rank
12th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 37.5% against 34.7% in Latvia, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5% | 10.5% | 8.0% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 9.4% | 14.3% | 4.9% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 15.0% | 19.5% | 4.5% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 22.6% | 27.5% | 4.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 35.6% | 36.7% | 1.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 37.5% | 34.7% | 2.8% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary, Ghana or Latvia?
- Ghana, at 37.5% against 34.7% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary between Ghana and Latvia?
- 2.8%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.